When does the CIA think it's okay to kill Americans?

By Michael Glantz on February 13, 2013

A predator drone firing a hellfire missle.
Credit: Pan-African News Wire File Photos

Unfortunately, it’s not very clear.

Following the confirmation hearing of President Obama’s nomination for the next head of the CIA, John Brennan, there are more questions than answers about the justification our government uses to carry out targeted killings of American citizens. The debate started in 2011 when two American citizens, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, who were believed to be high ranking operatives in al-Qaeda, were killed in a “targeted strike” carried out by the CIA. The “targeted strikes” are launched by remotely controlled unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones. The drone program is run by the CIA rather than the military. This is a problem because the CIA and military are subject to different kinds of oversight, with oversight of the former usually being inconsistent. For example, a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the American Civil Liberties Union regarding the targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki’s 16 year old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, was denied by a district judge because she could “find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.”

 Congress wants more oversight.

Following the leak of a Department of Justice memo that roughly outlines the criteria the administration feels are sufficient to kill Americans, Senators want more oversight of the drone program. Senator Ron Wyden put it this way, “Every American has the right to know when their government believes it’s allowed to kill them.” That statement comes as a reaction to parts of the DoJ memo that are exceedingly vague for such a sensitive issue. For instance, the official making the call needs only to be a “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government. Exactly how informed and how high-level is not readily apparent. The gray areas of this debate seem vastly larger than the black and white areas. Is this executive overreach? Or is this just a vital component of our national security apparatus that warrants secrecy? It seems that only time will tell.

I am a sophomore at the University of Denver studying Film and English. I am deeply interested in Politics and the role of the U.S. in the world at large.

Follow Uloop

Apply to Write for Uloop News

Join the Uloop News Team

Discuss This Article

More Uloop Politics Articles

DU HOUSING LISTINGS

30 Photos
21 Fitzsimons Apartment Homes
39 Photos
Summit View Village
20 Photos
The Overlook at Mile High
35 Photos
Green Leaf RockVue
38 Photos
8000 Uptown
See all DU Housing Listings

GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY

Receive recent DU news and classifieds on your Facebook Feed. Click the button below and then click "Like"

BROWSE OTHER COLLEGES

Back to Top

Log In

or Sign Up
Students
Post FREE Listings
Student Start Here
Employers
Post Jobs for Students
Employers Start Here
Housing Providers
Post Available Housing
Housing Start Here

Enter College Name to See Local Results

Log In

Contact Us

Your new password has been sent to your email!

Logout Successful!

You just missed it! This listing has been filled.

Post your own housing listing on Uloop and have students reach out to you!

Upload An Image

Please select an image to upload
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format
OR
Provide URL where image can be downloaded
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format

By clicking this button,
you agree to the terms of use

By clicking "Create Alert" I agree to the Uloop Terms of Use.

Image not available.
By clicking Get Started or Sign In you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service

Add a Photo

Please select a photo to upload
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format